What is the best Computer or Laptop for CAD Software such as Autocad, Solidworks, Inventor or Revit?
What is CAD-Software anyway, and why is it so difficult to find reliable information on what type of Hardware Components you need to build a greatly performing PC for CAD?
Well, let’s dive right in!
What is CAD Software and what is it not?
You might have already read some of our Articles that talk about building the best Computer for DCC (Digital Content Creation) Software such as Cinema 4D, After Effects or for Video Editing and 3D Modeling & Rendering.
The thing is, though many throw all of the 3D-“Modeling” types of Software into the same category, I do not consider Software such as Cinema 4D, Maya, 3DS Max or Blender, CAD Software –
CAD and DCC Software have some fundamental differences, that will also influence what Parts we should pick for our new PC.
The reason CAD and DCC Software have some fundamental differences, that will also influence what Parts we should pick for our new PC.
The main difference between these two types of Application Categories, is that the mentioned DCC Apps are targeted at Content Creation for visual purposes.
They don’t necessarily need high precision but rather should make an Image or Animation look believable or photorealistic, but not mathematically correct.
Because, hey, when I go watch a VFX Movie, that Space ship hovering over the Earth is quite believable, but if it is Mathematically correct and possible, is not really the issue here.
Another important factor in DCC Software such as Cinema 4D or Maya is, that they are mainly based on Polygons and not Curves.
Yes, there are tools that let you create curves and NURBS Objects, but the main work is usually done with polygons.
If you have enough Polygons you can make an object look round and smooth, even though it is actually made up of many small flat faces.
CAD Software though is targeted at mathematically precise Forms of content creation. If you zoom in on a car that was modeled in Solidworks, it will always be smooth, no matter how close you zoom in. (Sort of like the difference between Vector Software [CAD] and Pixel-based Software [DCC])
Content that simulates real-life properties.
It is of utmost importance that a rocket nozzle on a SpaceX Booster Engine is modeled to an extremely high mathematical precision, otherwise, the Rocket might not last very long after launch.
If it launches at all.

Image-Source: Autodesk
For the sake of this article let’s name the polygon 3D Software Packages “DCC” (Cinema 4D, Maya, 3dsmax, Blender, ..) and the Precision Software Packages “CAD” (Solidworks, Autocad, Revit, Inventor, SolidEdge …).
CAD Software comes in many forms and Brands, some open source, some crazily expensive.
In this Article on building the best PC for CAD Applications, I’ll focus on Autocad, Solidworks, Inventor and Revit, as these are among the most popular CAD Packages you can find.
Of course, lots of the theory and Part Recommendations can also be applied to other CAD Software as they all tend to work very similarly.
How do CAD Apps utilize the Hardware?
Very Similar to 3D Modeling and Rendering in DCC Apps, CAD Software benefits from a high-clocking CPU – for active work.
Active work means, you are sitting in front of your workstation and actively modeling and working on a project.
These I call attended tasks and they require you to interact and be present at all times, otherwise, your project does not progress.
The other type of task is the unattended task. This includes things like Rendering and Simulation caching and other processing tasks.
Unattended tasks run on their own and usually take longer than a few milliseconds to process (often hours or days).
Tasks that take days to process have a higher probability to be targeted by developers earlier in order to make them ready for multi-processing.
And of course, as soon as these tasks can be worked on by multiple cores simultaneously, they can be processed much faster.
Look at this Single VS Multi-Core Performance scaling to get a feel for how more Cores can improve performance in workloads that support multi-threading:

Image-Source: 3djuego.com
For speeding up tasks that can be parallelized (Rendering, (Most) Simulation, Image Processing ..), you will need the maximum number of Cores and not necessarily a high core clock.
Of course, having both, a high core clock and lots of cores is best, but not always possible.
So to recap:
- Your Active Work performance requires a high-clocking CPU
- Parallelizable tasks such as Rendering and Processing need lots of Cores.
Best Hardware for CAD
So let’s apply this to some real Hardware. What parts do we need for a PC anyway and what components make the CAD work we do the fastest:
Best Processor (CPU) for CAD Software
As you can see in these benchmarks that measure the CPU performance in Autocad, Solidworks, Inventor and Revit, the tendency is quite clear.
The higher the IPC a CPU has the better it performs in the respective CAD Software.

Image-Source: guru3d.com
IPC (Instructions per Cycle) of course is something that is not openly advertised by the manufacturer, so let’s take the Boost clock as an indicator.
The Turbo Boost Clock of a CPU is probably the closest we can match the IPC indicator of a CPU, with the benefit, that Boost Clocks are advertised on CPUs and this lets us easily buy and compare CPU Performance.
CPUs are clocked at a predefined Base Clock and can automatically overclock a Core or multiple cores to a higher Clock as long as the entire CPU with all its Cores does not exceed certain power or temperature limits.

Image-Source: guru3d.com
Let’s make an example: an Intel i7 8700K CPU has a base clock of 3,6GHz and a Boost Clock of 4,7GHz.
In this specific case the CPU can overclock 1 Core up to 4,7GHz, 2 Cores up to 4,6GHz 3C: 4,5GHz, 2-5C: 4,4GHz and all 6 Cores up to 4,3GHz.
This means, when we work in a Software that currently utilizes only 1 Core of a CPU, this CPU Core can and will most likely run at its advertised maximum Turbo Boost Clock.
The higher the Clock, the better the Performance.
Look at these Inventor Benchmarks of Finite Element Analysis Meshing. High-Core-Clocks with High Turbo-Boost Clocks win all the way (Lower is better):
Here are some Revit Benchmarks made by Pugetsystems. Again, in Single-Threaded Workloads a High-Core Clock (IPC) wins, in multi-threaded workloads such as Rendering, more Cores win.
Performance relative to an i7 7700K that has 4,5GHz Boost Clock, 4 Cores, 8 Threads

Image-Source: Pugetsystems.com
These Autocad 2D and 3D Performance Benchmarks were taken with the Cadalyst Benchmark Tool and show how high-core-clocks win every time.

Image-Source: tomshardware
The 3D Performance Benchmarks too have high-clocking CPUs at the top of the ranking:

Image-Source: tomshardware
And one last CPU Benchmark for Solidworks, confirming what we have already seen:

Image-Source: tomshardware
Turbo Boost and IPC are so important because many tasks cannot be parallelized.
Either because the Software’s Codebase is old and hasn’t been updated or optimized (for parallelization) in a long time, or because certain Tasks just can’t be parallelized, because of things like dependencies.
Think about this example concerning dependencies: You are modeling a House in Revit or Sketchup and have your Scene nicely optimized in a non-destructive Hierarchical structure.
It looks a bit like this:
- House Wall Extrusion
- Room1
- Window Boolean
- Edge Bevel
- screw Booleans on Edge Bevel
- Edge Bevel
- Window Boolean
- Room1
Now we will thicken the House Wall Extrusion a bit.
We have 5 different Objects and would think that having a CPU with (in this case) 5 Cores would speed up the thickening of the House Wall Extrusion, because every core can work on one object, right?

Image-Credit: Sketchup Help
Wouldn’t that speed things up nicely?
It would, but unfortunately, because the Objects dependent on each other as they are in a hierarchical chain, the CPU will have to start stepping through from the topmost Hierarchical Element first and then move towards the deeper Elements of the hierarchy.
There is no way the “screw Booleans” can already be calculated before the Edge Bevel has been finished processing and so on. Because of dependencies.
A single CPU-Core will have to work through the entire hierarchy chain by itself.
A single CPU will have to first calculate the thicker Wall Extrusion, after that it can calculate the Window Boolean, then the Edge Bevel on The Window Boolean, then the Edge Bevel on that Window Boolean Edge, and only after all of these have been stepped through can the CPU calculate the screw Booleans that are in the Edge Bevel.
And this is an example which is quite simple, made for easy understanding. What usually goes on inside a CAD Software is much more complex.
So long story short: We need a high clocking CPU, that optimally has a nice Boost Clock on one or more cores, to be able to actively work as fast as possible with a responsive and snappy Viewport in CAD Applications.
Here are the currently highest clocking CPUs which will bring the most performance to your active work:
- Intel i9 10900K – 3.7 GHz base, 5.3 GHz Turbo Clock
- Intel i7 10700K – 3.8 GHz base, 5.1 GHz Turbo Clock
- Intel i9 9900K – 3.6 GHz base, 5.0 GHz Turbo Clock
- Intel i7 9700K – 3.6 GHz base,4.9 GHz Turbo Clock
- AMD Ryzen 9 3950X – 3.5 GHz base, 4.7 GHz Turbo Clock
- AMD Ryzen 9 3900X – 3.8 GHz base, 4.6 GHz Turbo Clock
- AMD Ryzen 7 3800X – 3.9 GHz base, 4.5 GHz Turbo Clock
- AMD Ryzen 7 3700X – 3.6 GHz base, 4.4 GHz Turbo Clock
These are all high-clocking CPUs that will give you a smooth working experience within your CAD Application.
What about Xeon or other “professional” CPUs?
What’s the deal with Xeon? It seems to be recommended very often on CAD Software Manufacturers Sites, so it should perform well, shouldn’t it?
Well, the thing with Xeon is, you usually trade Software and Driver certification, official Support and a high Price for Performance.
Intel Xeons are a lot pricier than the CPUs I listed above, their clocks are lower, IPC is lower & the Turbo Boost Clocks are lower.
BUT, Xeons have ECC Memory Support (Error Correcting memory) that can in very rare cases make your CAD Software a bit more stable.
Also, often times expensive CAD Software Manufacturers only offer support when you actually have a Xeons (that they recommend and then, of course, should also support) and not a mainstream or High-End-Desktop CPU.
So if you absolutely need reliability and need immediate support for your systems, then you would have to go the Xeon Route for many of the top tier CAD Apps out there.
Then again, if you value performance over reliability and can support yourself by googling or asking in forums, you should be getting a performance CPU as mentioned above, such as the Intel i7, i9 or AMD Ryzen / Threadripper CPUs.
Best Graphics Card for CAD Software
Let’s shed some light on to the Quadro vs. Geforce debate:
The Benchmarks will support my writing: The Geforce GTX or RTX Cards are faster in almost all CAD Benchmarks. Autocad, Inventor, Solidworks, Revit you name it.
BUT, professional GPUs such as Nvidia’s Quadro Cards have other things to offer.
They have different Drivers than their mainstream counterparts which enable some features in various CAD apps. Take Solidworks for example: It has a feature called RealView, which is only supported on Pro-GPUs.
Also, the question of Official Vendor Support should not be neglected.
Many CAD Application Vendors only offer (good) support if you use Hardware that has been certified by them, and this certified Hardware consists of mostly Professional-Tier Components like Nvidia’s Quadro Series or AMD’s Radeon Pro GPUs.
Ask yourself, do you need specific features (e.g. in Solidworks) that are only supported on Pro-GPUs or do you need official vendor support?
If it’s just your own Workstation you have to worry about and you can troubleshoot on your own and want the fastest experience possible and would like to save some money (because Pro-GPUs are so much more expensive) go with a Geforce GTX or RTX GPU, or an AMD Mainstream GPU.
An Nvidia RTX 2080Ti leads in performance against most Pro-GPUs in many Benchmarks, and costs a lot less.

Image-Source: gamersnexus.com
That said, Solidworks is a bit of a special case: It does benefit from Quadro cards. It seems this Software’s Codebase has been well optimized to make use of the additional Features that Nvidia Quadros have to offer (Or mainstream GPUs have been artificially crippled).
If you do want to go with a quadro, these Benchmarks by Pugetsystems will show you the performance of current GPUs:

Image-Credit: Pugetsystems
Now that we have the most controversial Parts of a CAD Computer out of the way lets move on to some standards:
Best Motherboard for CAD Applications
Different Motherboards won’t influence your performance all that much, but you should make sure the Motherboard you are buying supports all the features you need and matches the Hardware that you are going to plug into it.
Of course, you should match the Motherboard Socket to the CPU you chose earlier. Get an LGA1200 Motherboard (Z490 Chipset) for an Intel Core i9 10900K (or same Generation) CPU, and an AM4 Motherboard (X570 Chipset) for an AMD Ryzen 3900X CPU.

Image Source: MSI
Other features you should look out for might be the amount of PCIe-Slots that you can plug Graphics Cards into, the amount of USB connectors, the amount of supported RAM Modules and RAM Slots as well as the number of Storage Devices such as M.2 Slots you have available to use.
For the Intel i9 9900K, that I currently recommend highly for CAD Apps, you will need an LGA 1151 v2 Motherboard such as the Gigabyte Z390 Designare.
Do give our Motherboard Guides a quick read, if you are having trouble picking a suitable one. We have a Motherboard Guide for Intel 9th Gen CPUs, Intel 10th Gen CPUs and AMD CPUs.
Best RAM (Memory) for CAD Software
CAD Work is very similar to working in 3D Applications like Cinema 4D or Maya.
The amount of RAM needed depends very much on how complex your projects and assemblies are and how many projects you have opened at the same time.
Also, if you tend to have more RAM-hungry Applications in addition to your CAD Software open at the same time, you should make sure you have lots of RAM.
Running Windows 10, for example, and having Chrome, a Mail Program, some other DCC Software like Photoshop and Illustrator and a Word-Processing App open at the same time in addition to your CAD Software will surely eat away at your RAM much more than when you have only one App open at a time.
It is ease of use that we are looking for, and closing down other Applications just so we can use our CAD Software is not very efficient.
For lighter CAD work you should be looking to buy at least 16GB of RAM.
With more complex assemblies or when you are using multiple Apps at the same time, you should be leaning towards 32GB or even 64GB of RAM.

Image-Source: Corsair
For Mainstream or HEDT CPUs such as the Intel i7, i9 or Ryzen / Threadripper CPUs, I recommend the Corsair Vengenace LPX DDR4 RAM that comes in all sorts of Memory capacities.
Memory Clock Speed can influence your CPU’s performance and it is advised to aim for RAM clocked at 3200Mhz or higher.
Best SSD / HDD / Storage for CAD Work
Assemblies and other Project Files can get quite big, especially on complex projects. You will be happy to have enough space to keep all of your projects saved in multiple revisions – Additionally, a fast drive for loading and saving your Projects will keep you working longer and waiting less.
The currently best type of storage Device for most PC-workloads, including CAD workloads, is the NVMe M.2 SSD.
This stands for Non-Volatile Memory Express M.2 (the form factor) Solid State Drive and basically is an SSD that has been further developed to:
- Be smaller
- Use a faster interface and
- Be much faster in reading and writing data.
You can plug an NVMe SSD into the Motherboard without needing any cables. It is about the size of a stick of gum, and about 5 times as fast as a regular SATA SSD and even about 25x faster than a mechanical HDD.
I recommend getting an NVMe SSD from the Samsung 970 EVO Plus Series, that come in sizes from 250GB – 2TB.
Of course, NVMe Drives are somewhat more expensive than HDDs or SATA SSDs and it’s best to get both – A smaller NVMe SSD for active projects, apps, and the OS. And a large HDD for Backup and Archiving.
In this day and age, and for High-Performance CAD workloads, an NVMe SSD should be a standard on the buy-list. Do check out our NVMe SSD Guide to see more of the options available.
Best PC-Case for CAD Work
The Computer-Case, of course, will not influence the performance of your CAD Build in any way. Well maybe in terms of air-flow, but that can usually be neglected as CAD Work doesn’t tend to make your CPU or GPU overheat all that fast (unless you’re doing some heavy rendering).
There are lots of Cases out there in all kinds of Colors, Sizes and from all kinds of Brands.
There is not much you can do wrong here. Check your Motherboard Form-Factor (e.g. M-ATX or ATX or E-ATX) and make sure your case can fit this Motherboard size. The most common size is ATX and you’ll find a gazillion options to choose from.
A nice Case that I keep coming back to is the be quiet! Silent Base 601, as it looks professional and has some noise dampening features that will make your CAD PC quieter.

Image-Source: be quiet
Best PSU for CAD
The Power Supply Unit should have enough Wattage to be able to Power your Components.
If you are unsure as to how much Watt your selected Components actually need, check out this easy to use Wattage-Calculator over on bequiet’s Website.
Some reliable Brands to look out for are Corsair, beQuiet, Seasonic and EVGA that I have all been able to successfully use and test for quite some while now.
We have a Guide to finding the best modular PSU’s here if you need some more specific recommendations.
I recommend buying a somewhat stronger PSU than you currently need. This way you can upgrade to more powerful components in the future without having to buy a new PSU.
Finished PC Builds
That’s about it for the Main Hardware Components needed for a great Computer for CAD Work!
Let’s take a look at some finished Builds at different price points, that will work well with CAD Apps such as Autocad, Solidworks, Inventor, Revit and lots of others.
Keep in mind, that these are Performance builds and not Reliability/Support Builds. If you are responsible for CAD Computers at a large Company you might want to trade performance for reliability and support, but that, of course, is up to you.
Performance Builds: Best Computers for CAD
Best Computer for CAD, AMD ~1000$
Some Build notes:
AMD’s 3rd Gen Ryzen CPUs bring a lot of bang for your buck to the table and will make sure to accelerate your active work and Viewport Performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X sports 8 Cores / 16 Threads that clock fairly high (3.6GHz Base, 4.4 GHz Turbo Clock) and can blaze through some of your renders in no time.
At this price point, the Nvidia GTX 1660 6GB, 16GB of DDR4-3000 RAM and Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe SSD easily step up to the task of making this a great budget PC-Build for CAD.
Best Computer for CAD, AMD ~1600$
Some Build notes:
Stepping up the performance into a roughly 1600$ PC-Build, this configuration brings a 12-Core Ryzen 3900X CPU with it, which clocks higher and sports more cores for faster active work and rendering. I added a third-party CPU Cooler, the beQuiet Dark Rock Pro 4 to the Build List, which is one of the best Air Coolers to keep the CPU nice and cool, even during sustained loads.
The Nvidia RTX 2060 Graphics Card is a workhorse which will enable you to do some fast GPU rendering and will handle any OpenGL/Viewport related tasks without any hiccups.
32GB of RAM and a 500GB Samsung 970 Evo Plus make sure you can work on complex CAD Projects and have multiple of them opened at the same time.
Best Computer for CAD, Intel ~2800$
This 2800$ Intel PC Build brings with it all the bells and whistles that you can think of. Although the Intel i9 9900K CPU has less cores than the 3900X from AMD, those cores do clock higher and will make your active work snappier and smoother.
The GPU is an Nvidia 2080 Super is a beast of a Graphics Card, which will blaze through your GPU Renders in no time. True, if GPU rendering or other GPU intensive tasks aren’t part of your everyday work, this might be a bit overkill, but for those who can make use of it, it’s a great time-saver.
64GB of RAM make sure you’ll almost never have to close down a Project or Software again and the two 2TB SSDs make sure you have enough space for lots of Programs and Projects.
Reliability Build: Best Computer for CAD
Best reliability Computer for CAD, Intel XEON / Nvidia Quadro ~6350$
- CPU: Intel Xeon W-2145, 8x 3.70GHz
- CPU-Cooler: be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
- Motherboard: ASUS WS C422 Pro/SE
- Memory: 2x (or 4x) Kingston Server Premier DIMM 16GB, DDR4-2666, CL19-19-19, reg ECC (KSM26RS4/16HAI)
- Storage: Samsung – 970 Evo 500GB M.2-2280 Solid State Drive
- GPU: PNY Quadro P6000, 24GB GDDR5X, DVI, 4x DP
- Case: Fractal Design Define S – ATX Midi Tower
- Power Supply: Corsair Professional Series Platinum AX760 760W
This is an excellent Reliability / Durability / Stability Computer for CAD Applications with the potential of being granted Support from more picky Software Manufacturers. The Xeon gets you ECC RAM Support and the Quadro offers Drivers with additional Features in many CAD Apps as well as 10bit Monitor Color output. The price tag sure is hefty, but that is what you pay nowadays for reliability.
Custom PC-Builder Tool
Head on over to the Web-Based CGDirector Custom PC-Builder Tool that lets you configure your Computer at custom price points for all kinds of purposes. It suggests parts that work well together and gets the maximum performance out of your budget.
Build your own Computer
Assembling your Computer yourself has many benefits. It is much cheaper to buy the individual hardware Components and assemble them on your own.
It is lot’s of fun, it’s easy and you learn a lot.
With that knowledge, you should be able to troubleshoot any problems that might arise later-on yourself, without having to bring your Computer to a shop to have it fixed.
You can upgrade parts yourself when newer and faster hardware is available and you learn a lot about how computers work, which never hurts!
Start by taking a look at what parts you need for building your own Computer.
After that, here is our PC Build Guide for you to read or, if you are the visual type, here is an easy to follow Video Tutorial on how to build/assemble your own Computer:
Best Laptops for CAD Software such as Autocad, Solidworks, Inventor, Revit and more
So what about Laptops? We have been talking about Desktop Computers all this time but fortunately, everything we discussed above can also be applied to a Laptop.
The Theory behind what is important to create a greatly performing Laptop for CAD Work is the same as in desktop Computers for CAD.
We will need a high-clocking CPU, a GTX or RTX GPU, 16-32GB of RAM and a fast M.2 SSD.
In Laptops, as the Hardware components are usually supposed to draw much less power the components will not reach the performance of Desktop Computer Parts.
But that is to be expected from such a small enclosure. In a Laptop, you get the benefit of Mobility but trade it for performance.
In Laptops too, we will differentiate between performance vs reliability/support, as both the Xeon CPUs and the Quadro GPUs are available for Laptops.
Best Performance Laptop for CAD Software
If it’s Performance you are after, you will want to lean towards a high-clocking CPU and a higher-end GPU such as the GTX 1070 as you will find in the following Laptop:
The GIGABYTE Aero 15 OLED 15″ Ultra Slim Laptop

Image-Credit: Gigabyte
The Specifications on this Gigabyte Laptop are:
- CPU: i7-9750H
- GPU: GeForce RTX 2070 with 8GB of VRAM
- RAM: 16GB RAM
- SSD: 512GB PCIe SSD
- Win 10 Pro
- 15,6″ / 4K IPS Screen with a FullHD Resolution
Some notes on this Laptop:
The Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED is the newest of a long line of excellent Laptops for Content Creators. It comes with an excellent 15,6″ 4K IPS Screen which performs admirably for visually demanding work.
The Nvidia RTX 2070 is a top-tier GPU with 8GB of VRAM and the Intel i7-9750H will make sure your active work and viewport experience is as smooth as it can get in a mobile form factor. The great thing is, it sports a numpad, which is very rare in 15″ Laptops – I personally use the numpad all the time, but you might feel differently.
If the Gigabyte hasn’t hit your sweet spot yet, here are two more great choices:
- ASUS ROG Zephyrus G15 (2020) with an AMD 4800H CPU and an Nvidia 1660Ti, which is quite affordable.
- Razer Blade 15 Series Laptops, which are quite popular among Content Creators and Gamers alike.
Best Reliability / Support / Stability Laptop for CAD Software
The Lenovo ThinkPad P52 (2018) 15.6″ Business Laptop.

Image-Source: Lenovo
The Specifications on this Gigabyte Laptop are:
- CPU: Xeon E-2176
- GPU: Quadro P2000 (4GB)
- RAM: 16GB RAM
- SSD: 512GB PCIe SSD
- Win 10 Pro
- 15,6″ IPS Screen with a FullHD Resolution
Some notes on this Laptop:
The Lenovo ThinkPad P52 has a 6-Core Intel Xeon CPU that boosts up to 4.4GHz. With 16GB of Ram, an Nvidia Quadro P2000 GPU and a PCIe-M.2 SSD you will get the Reliability Workstation Experience inside a mobile Form factor.
That’s about it! What Computer or Laptop for CAD are you thinking of buying?
Hi Alex,
thanks for a great article.
I had to arrange the config. in a big rush, article was a big help.
According to currently available parts (crazy situation, espec. with cpu and gpu:)),
and your tips for a budget variant, configuration is as follows:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (4.4GHz, S.AM4), 8 core
CPU cooling: AMD original
MBO: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming, DDR4
RAM: G.Skill Aegis 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 3000MHz
SSD: Samsung Evo 970 500GB NVMe M.2
GPU: Gainward Pegasus NVidia GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB GDDR6
PSU: Zalman 650W, 80+ bronze, black
CASE: Zalman Z1
1000 € in Croatia.
Best regards!
Hi Alex,
Glad that I found your page, I was thinking of building my own PC since my laptop is very laggy. I will be heavily using Revit, Autocad, Sketch-up, Lightroom and Photoshop for mostly 3D modelling and rendering. I also have a huge database of raw pictures for photography, which is why I have lightroom.
Do you think that these specs is enough and future proof? Or way to overkill.
CPU – AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 3.7/4.8 ghz 12 cores 24 threads
RAM – Patriot AMD Blackout 32gb (2x16gb) DDR4 3600mhz
GPU – MSI RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2x OC 8gb
Love to hear your opinion, on best value for money for the mentioned softwares and usage.
Hey Angelo,
Those specs are superb. I’d say they are in the higher-end of things for your kind of workloads, but that also means they will last you longer before you need a new PC or an upgrade.
I see no issues!
Cheers,
Alex
Hi, Alex
I cant decided the MSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI and ASUS ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING. These two have all the features that I need for CAD and light gaming. After reading a lot of comments on both. Im getting more loss. Hope you can give me some opinions to help me pick one.
Thanks
Hey Kev,
I’d go MSI for this one. The Intel LAN controller…has issues. A new stepping did fix it in November, but since it’s a hardware issue, it’ll require ASUS to make the change as well. The Z490-E is an older board, so I don’t think ASUS updated it yet.
Here’s a relevant thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/intel/comments/i9t4oe/did_they_fix_the_issues_with_intel_i225v/
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex,
I’m so glad I’ve bumped into this article. I’m a new student of Architecture and in need of a computer that will allow me to multitask and be fast. I will be using Autocad and probably Archicad or Revit it for 3D modelling and rendering. I will need to run other apps from the creative cloud at the same time. I’m currently getting some quotes but there are so many terms I don’t know it’s overwhelming. May I ask what you think about this one?
INTEL CORE I-9 COMPUTER
MSI Z490-A PRO SKT1200,4*DDR4.3*PCIEx1,2*PCIEx16, ATX MB (INTEL) INTEL i9-10900 2.8GHz (5.2GHz TUROB) LGA1200 125W CPU KINGSTON 32GB DDR4 3200MHz HYPER-X
MSI RTX3070 GAMINGG X TRIO 8GDDR6,HDMI,3*DP V1.4,PCIE SAMSUNG 1TB ** 860 EVO ** SATA3 SSD
IN-WIN 216 TEMPERED GLASS ATX BLACK CASE
IN-WIN P-750W 80+ GOLD FULLY MODULAR POWER SUPPLY MS WIN 10 HOME PREM (64BIT)
2 YEAR WARRANTY
Quote total inclusive of tax is $3,137.57
I would really appreciate your opinion:)
Thanks
Susanna
Hey Susanna,
The PC looks like a solid buy. It would be an even better buy if it came with an AMD Ryzen 5900X or 5950X CPU instead of the Intel 10900 CPU. (They’ll have to swap out the motherboard for an AM4 board too but they should have no problem with that)
The other parts in that build look great and will run your workloads well.
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex,
Haven’t run across quality content like this in ages. I’m a professional engineer licensed in NY and am thinking about going out on my own. Looking for and end all be all build under the 3K mark that I could upgrade to keep relevant. Doesn’t even need to be a build, a stock upgradeable would be stellar.
I’ll be running Civil 3D and Inventor at the most, but multiple programs in the background as well. Would like the ability to have 2 Microstation programs running simultaneously with word excel etc. side by side on monitors. Could you give me the 3k dream build / stock model or let me know if I’m not even close with the budget? Thank you sir, have a wonderful day.
Hey Daniel,
3k$ is a good budget for the workloads you are running. Here’s a build that would have no trouble running multiple programs side-by-side too:
AMD RYZEN 9 5900X
Noctua NH-U12S SE-AM4
MSI MEG X570 UNIFY
Nvidia RTX 3070
G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (2 x 32GB) 3600 CL16
Seagate FireCuda 520 M.2 2280 2TB PCIe Gen4 (Working projects)
Intel 665p Series M.2 2280 1TB PCIe NVMe 3.0 (OS / Software)
Toshiba HDD 4.0TB 7200 128MB SATA3 3.5 {Projects and backup)
Corsair HX850 850W
Fractal Design Define 7
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex – great overview – this was excellent to better understand what controls what in term of performance. Thank you! Would greatly appreciate your input on the following configs – looking for something that would allow heavy modeling and rendering for architectural projects and possibly with a 3-5 years with no upgrades. I m leaning towards a Lenovo thinkstation p620 only change between the two configs are to the Mem and video Card
What do you think? Is the additional Memory and the more powerful GPU card compatible with the rest or an overkill as the rest won’t keep up?
Any suggestion will be more than welcome –
Thanks!
Cheers
Maria
option 1 – configured
AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ Pro 3955WX Processor (3.90 GHz, up to 4.30 GHz Max Boost, 16 Cores, 32 Threads, 8 MB Cache)
Windows 10 Pro 64
Windows 10 Pro 64 English
MB AMD Castle Peak
64 GB DDR4 3200MHz
NVIDIA® Quadro® RTX 5000 16GB
1 TB M.2 Gen 3 PCIe SSD, OPAL
AMD Integrated Controller
Tower WRX80 92% Power 1000W
15 in 1 Card Reader
5.25″ Flex Module
option 2 is preconfigured – it is the current offer for the p620 with the following specs
● Processor AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 3955WX Processor (3.90 GHz, up to 4.30 GHz Max Boost, 16 Cores, 32 Threads, 64 MB Cache)
● Operating System Windows 10 Pro 64
● Memory 32 GB DDR4 3200MHz (2 x 16 GB)
● Hard Drive 1 TB M.2 Gen 3 PCIe SSD, OPAL
● Optical Drive DVD-RW
● Graphics NVIDIA® Quadro® RTX™ 4000 8GB
● Keyboard USB Traditional – US English
● Pointing Device USB Optical Mouse
● Form Factor Tower 92% Power 1000W
● Network Card Integrated Ethernet
● Key lock Key Lock Kit w/ Common Key
● Memory Card Reader 15 in 1 Card Reader
Hey Maria,
64GB of RAM should only be necessary if you use a lot of different programs at the same time. If you’re just doing work in archicad for example, the 32GB should be fine.
As for the GPU: This depends a bit on the complexity of your projects. If you think you’re working on projects that have a lot going on and you might want to do some GPU rendering too, the higher-tier RTX 5000 sounds like a good choice.
The rest of the system looks great.
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex,
Im looking to do my first PC build soon, which I’ll use mainly for Solidworks, Matlab, some programming, and maybe some 4k video editing. I have come up with the following build, and wanted to get your opinion on it if that’s possible! The only issue is its a little above my budget, as all in all its about 1800 CAD, while Id be looking for something closer to 1500 CAD. If you have any suggestions on where I could lower the cost that would be appreciated as well.
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
MSI MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK Motherboard
Noctua NH-U12A CPU Cooler
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 32GB (16×2) 3200 MHz
Sapphire Radeon Pulse RX 5700 XT Graphics Card
EVGA 650 B5, 80 Plus Bronze 650W PSU
be quiet! Pure Base 500DX Case
Cheers,
Luka
Hey Luka,
The build looks good to me. If you can find the Nvidia 2060 super for a similar price as the RX5700XT, that might be a good option too, as lots of content creation apps seem to work better in conjunction with an Nvidia GPU.
Other than that I see no issues! Go for it! 🙂
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex, thank you for your reply!
I did want to ask a couple more questions with regards to the build:
1. Unfortunately the Noctua NH-U12A cooler is sold out, so I was thinking about replacing it with the be quiet! Pure Rock Slim 35.14 CFM cooler. Thoughts? Do you have a different recommendation?
2. Also, the 500DX case was sold out, so I had to replace it with the 600. If you have any thoughts on this as well let me know.
3. Forgive me if it seems like a silly question, but should I also add extra storage (SSD/HDD)?
Thanks again for the help! 🙂
Hey Luka,
Since the 3900X comes with a stock cooler, the reason you would get a third party cooler to use is to have it be cooled better than with the stock cooler. The Dark Rock slim will not cool any better than the stock cooler, so there really wouldn’t be a reason to get that. Either get the Dark Rock 4 / pro 4, or stick with the stock cooler 🙂
The 600 case is great too!
I was thinking you already had some storage that you would use. But yes, you should definitely have at least one SSD, preferably an nvme ssd.
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex, what is your take on Vram? The pro gpu cards tend to have more vram than the consumer cards. For example a Radeon Pro Vii has 16GB the same as a Quadro RTX 5000. The RTX 3080 is sporting 10GB, but the performance makes it very appealing. What would an architecture student vs a mechanical engineer vs a 3D modeller/render be looking at in terms of Vram? How complex of a model/design would fit into 10GB, vs 16GB vs 24GB. Your article was great it covered many of the concerns I’ve been researching for my build…. but I haven’t found any good reviews of Vram for CAD/modeling work loads. Thanks for your time!! Carl C.
Hey Carl,
This is an excellent question and I’d have to do some more testing to be able to answer it accurately. I would expect the 3D/Render workloads to make best use of a lot of VRAM because the scene is baked with all subdivs and the textures are all uploaded to the gpu in full res in addition to having raytracing trees that are built and can take up a lot of room.
Both Architecture and Engineering would rely on nurbs/curves rather than polygons, so I’d expect those to be much more space-efficient. You should be able to work on fairly complex models in CAD programs, vs rendering those out.
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex, really enjoyed the post. I’m a light gamer and going into college studying engineering (maybe Mechanical or Electrical/Computer). I was wondering if you could give me some comments for my build?
I have the following already:
Ryzen 7 3800XT
1TB M.2 Samsung SSD
650 Watt Corsair PSU
16gb of Vengence RAM
(regular case)
I still need a Graphics Card to finish it off and I’m planning on buying a B550M Aorus Pro Motherboard from Gigabyte.
What GPU would you recommend? I was looking at a 2060 Super Windforce from EVGA. Will this GPU be too gaming and not good for CAD/Solid Works or coding? (PS. Should I wait for Nividia’s 30 series GPU’s?)
What do you think about the mobo?
Do I have enough RAM and enough PSU wattage for my rig?
How can I make it my rig more future proof? (I’m willing to sell the current parts and buy better ones.)
Thank you in advance.
Hey John,
For single GPU builds, the b550 Motherboard is great! I would in fact wait for the nvidia RTX3000 GPUs as the 3070 should get you about the same performance as a 2080Ti at half the cost. Take a look at some of the reviews that should be published today.
The PSU is fine if you only get a single GPU. 16GB of RAM is a good start that will take you far, but to be on the safe side, 32GB will keep you happy for a lot longer, especially if you dive into more complex projects.
As you have pcie4 on the b550 Motherboard and the next gen Ryzen CPU will be compatible, I’d say the build is very future proof.
Cheers,
Alex
How much longer will the Nvidia 30 series last compared to the Nvidia 20 series, in terms of both how long each will last before their old/broken and performance. I’m looking at a 2060 super EVGA SC Ultra at $270, which is a pretty good price. Given that price though, you would still recommend to wait for the 30 series?
Some of the website PSU calculaters are recommending over 1000 watts for the total system.
Also, is 1TB M.2 SSD to big for programs? Should I get another regular ssd for Windows 10 and small docs files?
Hey John,
Not entirely sure what you mean with how long they will last? Both the 2060 Super and the RTX 3080 can last indefinitely if you treat them well, neither is superior in longevity.
A 3080 of course is 3 times as performant vs a 2060 super, but also costs more.
With 320W Power consumption, a 750 or 850W PSU is recommended for a single GPU system.
1TB is not too big and I’d even recommend it, as over the years you will fill it up more and more.
Cheers,
Alex
Hi Alex, started sourcing parts for a new home cad computer/all around build and am looking for a gpu recommendation. Currently, I’ve already acquired an Aorus Z390 master, i9-9900K, 64gb Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro, 1Tb 970 EVO. The 3 programs that would normally be used are Autocad, Fusion, and Solidworks. Was looking for a RTX 2080 TI based on the info above but those seem to be pretty hard to come by and expensive today. That swayed me to look into an Quadro RTX 4000. What would your recommendation be including possible alternatives? Thanks in advance!
Hey Brandon,
Those two GPUs are a pretty nice selection. Usually I’d recommend going with the 2080Ti for most apps, but Solidworks does make good use of Quadro Features, so if you use that a lot, the RTX 4000 looks like a solid buy for your workloads.
Cheers,
Alex