Cinebench R20 Scores (Updated Results)

CG Director Author Alex  by Alex  ⋮   ⋮   12 comments
CGDirector is Reader-supported. When you buy through our links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Cinebench R20 is based on technology of the well-known Digital Content Creation Software, Cinema 4D, but now utilizes the R20 Version’s Render Engine.

This updated rendering Benchmark now supports the AVX command set which will give us more realistic results of how modern Processors behave in multi-threaded workloads such as CPU Rendering.

Cinebench R20 is also great for finding the best CPUs for lightly-threaded workloads such as 3D Modeling and Animation and Video Editing.

Cinebench R20 Scores List

Cinebench R20 benches two CPU performance Values:

  • Multi-Core-Score. This score will tell you how fast the CPU is in multi-processing tasks that utilize all of the available Cores. This includes rendering, encoding and other computational multi-threaded work
  • Single-Core Score. The Cinebench R20 Single Core Score tells you how fast the CPU is when only a single Core is utilized. This is often a good metric for Software and Viewport snapiness and overall active work performance
CPU NameCoresGhzSingle ScoreMulti Score
CPU NameCoresGHzSingle ScoreMulti Score
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G43.74171995
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X63.33892764
AMD Ryzen 5 260063.43742736
Intel i7 7800X63.54813752
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X63.64212048
Intel i7 870063.23313547
AMD Ryzen 7 170083.01373189
Intel i7 8700K63.75193793
AMD Ryzen 7 270083.24032448
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X83.43443336
Intel i7 9700KF83.64663656
Intel i7 9700K83.64663656
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X83.63813587
AMD Ryzen 5 160063.23572501
AMD Threadripper 1900X83.84033678
Intel i9 9900KF83.65134309
Intel i9 9900K83.65134309
Intel i9 7900X103.34615286
AMD Threadripper 1920X123.54065326
AMD Threadripper 2920X123.54395843
AMD Threadripper 1950X163.44116731
AMD Threadripper 2950X163.54497003
AMD Epyc 7451242.33176768
Intel Xeon Gold 6148202.41616342
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160242.12865259
AMD Epyc 7601322.23077445
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X83.74113956
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180282.53768585
Intel i5 9600K63.74812624
Intel i7 8750H62.24192497
Intel i7 9750H62.64422653
Intel i5 860063.13952051
Intel i9 9900X103.54585402
Intel i9 9920X123.54576032
Intel i9 9940X143.34516945
Intel i9 9960X163.14507920
Intel i9 9980XE183.04488791
AMD Threadripper 2970WX243.04189624
AMD Ryzen 5 360063.64743539
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X63.84923895
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X83.65024856
Intel i5 9600KF63.74812624
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X83.95145054
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G43.53081307
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U42.03281352
Intel i7 8650U41.93651299
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U42.2120935
Intel i5 8300H42.33971689
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X43.53411811
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G43.63911911
Intel i5 840062.84112291
Intel i7 7700K44.24662257
Intel i7 8850H62.64032468
Intel i5 8600K63.64062181
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X123.85247100
AMD Threadripper 2990WX323.039811463

Download Cinebench R20 here

Download Cinebench R20 Benchmark for your System, it’s free, and test-drive your CPU to be able to compare it with the ones in this list.

After building a new PC anyone should test their new hardware with all kinds of benchmarks, such as Cinebench R20, to see if the hardware performs the way it should.

Download Cinebench R20

How to read these Scores

Ok, some more Info about these Cinebench Results: Cinebench Scores are linear.

This means a CPU that scores 2000 Cinebench points will be twice as fast (in Cinema 4D Rendering) as a CPU that scores 1000 Cinebench points.

Up to 256 threads are supported

In Cinebench R20, Maxon has significantly improved the scaling with many threads so that future processors can still be reliably tested: Up to 256 Threads are now supported.

Furthermore, a more complex ray-tracing scene is being used, which, according to the developer, requires eight times as much computing effort and four times as much memory compared to the now well-known scene from Cinebench R15.

Thanks to the photorealistic appearance of the rendered scene, the updated Benchmark should now also give a much better impression of what such programs are used for and what Cinema 4D is capable of in its newest version.

Once again, Cinebench R20 is a benchmark for single-threaded and multi-threaded CPU performance. The OpenGL Benchmark, that was included in Cinebench R15, has now been removed though, as it did not test the underlying OpenGL performance well.


Alex from CGDirector - post author

Hi, I'm Alex, a Freelance 3D Generalist, Motion Designer and Compositor.

I've built a multitude of Computers, Workstations and Renderfarms and love to optimize them as much as possible.

Feel free to comment and ask for suggestions on your PC-Build or 3D-related Problem, I'll do my best to help out!

12
Comments

Will

Hey what do you guys recommend I get a 2990wx over 2970wx are the extra cores going to really give the performance I need.
I could save that $200 and get a better you or more ram.

Mucan daniel

HI Alex.
Are these specs good enough for houdini.
Amd ryzen 9 3900x 12 core 3.8 ghz 24 threads
32 gb ddr4 2666
2x rtx 2080 super

Will

I don’t know about Houdini but I use Blender and that setup is more than adequate. I would recommend you rather get the R9 3950x instead and wait. Or if you the budget get a threadripper. And rather go for a 1 2080 ti, then 2 2080’s. Some applications don’t support SLI.
So you are going to have to disable it for some applications.

Vinh Nguyen Le

I own a 9750H and it have a score from 2450 to 2550

Ian

My 9940x scores between 6945-7000 stock so that makes sense, but how is the 3900x scoring 7100 at stock? The AVX frequency Cinebench R20 triggers at stock on the 9940x is 3900hz. What frequency are all cores on the 3900x at for the Cinebench R20 multithread benchmark?

Even if it were a higher frequency it would have to be significantly higher to beat out the two extra cores on the 9940x.

I’m also curious to know what cooler and temps are for the 3900x to get this 7100. I’m at about 71-75c to get close to a 7000 score on a Noctua D15s